Women in Islamic Politics

topic posted Sat, January 31, 2009 - 1:46 AM by  Erik
Share/Save/Bookmark
Advertisement
Wow. I wonder how long they will sustain it. Sea change?

January 31st, 2009
Nearly 4,000 women running in Iraqi elections
Posted: 03:57 AM ET

BAGHDAD, Iraq (CNN) — Nearly 4,000 women are running for office in Iraq’s provincial elections Saturday, and many of them will be guaranteed a seat under an electoral quota system.

Regardless of the votes their candidates receive, parties are required to give every third seat to a female candidate on their list, according to a report this week from the International Crisis Group.

The ultimate share of seats held by women will depend on the distribution of votes among parties, the report said.
posted by:
Erik
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • .
    .
    offline 39

    Re: Women in Islamic Politics

    Sat, January 31, 2009 - 2:54 AM
    clearly we should just abandon Iraq because we lost it two years ago
    • Re: Women in Islamic Politics

      Sat, January 31, 2009 - 10:25 AM
      Perhaps they don't need us anymore?
      • .
        .
        offline 39

        Re: Women in Islamic Politics

        Sat, January 31, 2009 - 11:03 AM
        its certainly getting to that point, but I think the commanders on the ground have the best notion about it, which is why they are pushing back against that 16 month timetable.

        But what do they know, we lost this war two years ago.
        • Re: Women in Islamic Politics

          Sat, February 14, 2009 - 9:15 AM
          I wonder if they will supply her with a driver?

          CNN) -- Saudi King Abdullah has appointed a woman to the council of ministers for the first time as part of a Cabinet reshuffle, networks including Saudi state-run Channel One reported Saturday.
          Saudi King Abdullah has appointed a woman to his council of ministers for the first time.

          Saudi King Abdullah has appointed a woman to his council of ministers for the first time.

          King Abdullah announced a new supreme court chief, minister of health, justice minister and information minister as part of the reshuffling, according to Channel One.

          King Abdullah appointed Noor Al-Fayez to the Saudi Council of Ministers. She will serve in a new position as deputy minister for women's education.

          "People are very excited about this," said Khaled Al-Maeena, editor-in-chief of Arab News, an English-language daily newspaper in Saudi Arabia. "This sends a clear signal that the King means business. Instead of appointing some bureaucrat, he appointed a woman."

          Jamal Khashoggi, editor-in-chief of Al-Watan Daily newspaper, told CNN the reshuffle signals a major change in his country.

          "This is a huge step forward, in education, women's place in society," said Khashoggi.

          The new appointments are the largest council shakeup since King Abdullah took power in 2005.

          Maeena also said the other new appointments by King Abdullah were very "progressive" moves.

          Some other new appointments were:

          -- Prince Faisal bin Abdullah bin Mohammed, new minister of education

          -- Faisal Al-Moammar, new deputy minister of education

          -- Sheikh Mohammed Al-Isa, new minister of justice

          -- Abdulaziz Al-Khowja, new minster of culture and information

          -- Dr. Abdullah Al-Rabeeah, new minister of health

          -- Sheikh Abdulaziz Al-Humain, new head of the Commission for the Promotion of Virtue and Prevention of Vice
          • Re: Women in Islamic Politics

            Sun, April 5, 2009 - 2:30 AM
            Hmmm. I wonder how many women were involved in the drafting of this baby?

            President backs law which 'legalises rape within marriage'

            By Daily Mail Reporter
            Last updated at 4:48 PM on 31st March 2009

            It is believed that President Hamid Karzai backed the law to appease fundamentalists ahead of the August elections.

            Afghanistan’s President Hamid Karzai has been accused of trying to win election votes by backing a law which the UN says legalises rape within marriage.

            The final document has not been published but it is believed to state that wives cannot refuse to have sex with their husbands.

            The Independent reports it also forbids wives from stepping outside their homes without their husbands’ permission.

            It is thought to have been rushed through parliament in a bid to appease Islamic fundamentalists ahead of the August elections.

            According to the United Nations Development Fund for Women (Unifem), the law also grants custody of children to fathers and grandfathers only and approves child marriage.

            Shinkai Karokhail, a female member of the Afghan parliament who campaigned against the legislation said: ‘It is one of the worst bills passed by the parliament this century.

            ‘It is totally against women’s rights. This law makes women more vulnerable.

            ‘It’s about votes. Karzai is in a hurry to appease the Shia because the elections are on the way.’

            Article 132 of the law states that women must obey their husband’s sexual demands and that a man can expect to have sex with his wife at least ‘once every four nights’ when traveling, unless they are ill.

            According to Unifem: ‘Article 132 legalises the rape of a wife by her husband.’

            Ustad Mohammad Akbari, an MP and the leader of the Hazara party claimed the law actually protected women’s rights.

            He said: ‘Men and women have equal rights under Islam but there are differences in the way men and women are created.

            ‘Men are stronger and women are a little bit weaker, even in the West you do not see women working as firefighters.’

            Karzai's spokesman declined to comment on the new law.
  • Unsu...
     

    Re: Women in Islamic Politics

    Wed, April 8, 2009 - 11:30 AM
    <<Nearly 4,000 women are running for office in Iraq’s provincial elections Saturday, and many of them will be guaranteed a seat under an electoral quota system.

    Regardless of the votes their candidates receive, parties are required to give every third seat to a female candidate on their list, according to a report this week from the International Crisis Group.>>

    Is this the type of democracy we encouraged/coerced upon them or is this an original Iraqi idea?
    • Re: Women in Islamic Politics

      Wed, April 8, 2009 - 11:46 AM
      Both. Iraqis were pretty secular under the Baathists. Bunch of fucking Nazis, of course, but they weren't quite as misogynistic as the fundamentalists. Here is hoping their gains won't be erased when we pull out. That will tell us a lot, one way or another.
      • Unsu...
         

        Re: Women in Islamic Politics

        Thu, April 9, 2009 - 12:40 AM
        <<... under the Baathists. Bunch of fucking Nazis, of course, but they weren't quite as misogynistic as the fundamentalists. Here is hoping their gains won't be erased when we pull out. That will tell us a lot, one way or another.>>

        So the coalition freed the people from the rule of fascists and is setting it on a path for a positive democratic future?

        That seems contrary to the usual tenor of the posts in political tribes about Bush and company having failed in Iraq.
        • Re: Women in Islamic Politics

          Thu, April 9, 2009 - 1:53 AM
          John:
          > So the coalition freed the people from the rule of fascists and is setting it on a path for a positive democratic future?

          Well... here's my view.

          We conquered Iraq in a couple of days. Had we gotten in, overthrown the dictatorship, and installed a solid democracy, it would have actually been great.

          Instead, we sent the country into a horrible civil war. The country is a huge mess. Hundreds of thousands have been killed. And, now we have the possibility of it turning into a free prosperous society; or not.

          So, in the long run it could work out for the best. But I don't think that's been shown at all yet.
          • Re: Women in Islamic Politics

            Thu, April 9, 2009 - 2:24 AM
            "That seems contrary to the usual tenor of the posts in political tribes about Bush and company having failed in Iraq."

            I've never said Iraq was a failure. I simply believe the cost was too high. There are plenty of horrible countries and tyrannical homicidal dictators around the world, some much worse (in my view) than Saddam was. The Sudanese have killed far more of their own people, much more quickly. Maybe we should invade them? I figure Bush was simply looking for an excuse, and 9-11 gave it to him, or so he apparently thought based upon faulty and/or cherry picked intelligence. Unlike his predecessors, both Democratic and Republican, he was simply an impatient boob. As with the Soviet Union, I believe containment until it collapsed of its own devices, would have been a better option. Hindsight is, of course, always 20/20, but I suspect the cost in lives, destruction and expenditure of taxpayer dollars would have been less.
          • .
            .
            offline 39

            Re: Women in Islamic Politics

            Thu, April 9, 2009 - 6:35 AM
            hundreds of thousands? Oh really, you know more than the UN, HRW, the Red Cross, and other groups who have been assessing war dead for decades?

            We did not send the country into a civil war. Saddam had been engaging in sectarian conflict for decades, he just kept it quiet and did it efficiently. After the US came in, most would agree that we pushed democracy too quickly, instead of establishing an iron fisted occupational government devoted to securing the people. This allowed for disgruntled groups to access arms and entertain violence. The degree of violence in Iraq was not a civil war, nor was it, in the historical scale of warfare, close to "horrible".
            • Re: Women in Islamic Politics

              Thu, April 9, 2009 - 7:55 AM
              Just a couple of relatively reliable sources. Hoping you are smart enough to figure out which post this is in response to.

              www.moreorless.au.com/killers...ein.html

              "Mass graves discovered following the US occupation of Iraq in 2003 suggest that the total combined figure for Kurds, Shias and dissidents killed could be as high as 300,000."

              users.erols.com/mwhite28/warstat3.htm

              "Iraq, Saddam Hussein (1979-2003): 300 000"

              So, in about 25 years Hussein (over 30 years of Baathist rule), around 300,000. Iraqi politicians say a million, but they might have an agenda encouraging inflation.

              In five years, around 400,000 have been killed in Darfur alone. How many Christians and Animists in the south? Not to mention how ever many Arab Sudanese were killed while executing these attempts at genocide.

              Even if the million figure was correct, that would be 40,000 a year. Horrible mass murder to be sure, but it is half the rate of Darfur. Then, of course, there are places like Cambodia, Rwanda, Congo (also ongoing), and even North Korea. Too bad kimchee can't be refined into gasoline.


              • .
                .
                offline 39

                Re: Women in Islamic Politics

                Thu, April 9, 2009 - 9:20 PM
                Erik, since you can't read your own sources, let me provide you with what you're missing:

                "These don't include the million or so dead in the Iran-Iraq War"

                Nor do they consider the one million dead thanks to Saddam's coercive application of sanctions.

                And the UN estimate of the Darfur conflict is around 300,000 - and that's a fairly high estimate, but if you want to engage in death toll one upsmanship, feel free.

                www.nytimes.com/2007/08/12...dealey.html
                • Re: Women in Islamic Politics

                  Fri, April 10, 2009 - 2:17 AM
                  Notice, once again, your first statement. Tsk, tsk, tsk. Doesn't make you feel better through, does it.

                  Please consider seeking professional help.
                  • This is the maximum depth. Additional responses will not be threaded.
                    .
                    .
                    offline 39

                    Re: Women in Islamic Politics

                    Fri, April 10, 2009 - 7:49 AM
                    Are you so self deluded that you can't see what YOU wrote in response to me?

                    "Hoping you are smart enough"

                    All I did was point out the obvious - you didn't read your own source, because if you had (I hope) you would not have presented incomplete and false information.

                    Physician, heal thyself.
                  • This is the maximum depth. Additional responses will not be threaded.

                    Re: Women in Islamic Politics

                    Fri, April 10, 2009 - 12:18 PM
                    Erik:
                    > Please consider seeking professional help.

                    _Both_ of you play nice, okay?
                    • Re: Women in Islamic Politics

                      Fri, April 10, 2009 - 2:28 PM
                      I'm truly concerned about his mental health. However, in future, I'll simply PM him about it.

                      Is it still okay for me to point out his derogatory ad hominems and belittling caveats? Others can then speculate about the psychological reasons behind them.
                      • .
                        .
                        offline 39

                        Re: Women in Islamic Politics

                        Fri, April 10, 2009 - 2:42 PM
                        Oh come off it, you're getting told to can it by two different mods in two different tribes, and you think that your bullshit isnt transparent?

                        You're the ad hom king, and pretending otherwise doesn't make it any different.

                        I only belittle ignorance.
                      • Re: Women in Islamic Politics

                        Fri, April 10, 2009 - 3:06 PM
                        Erik:
                        > Is it still okay for me to point out his derogatory ad hominems and belittling caveats?

                        Of course, that's always fine, so long as one doesn't point out ad hominem arguments by engaging in their own demeaning comments in retaliation.




                        • .
                          .
                          offline 39

                          Re: Women in Islamic Politics

                          Fri, April 10, 2009 - 3:14 PM
                          Is it ok for me to point out that Erik either doesnt read or doesnt comprehend the sources he uses to attempt to defend his positions?
                          • Re: Women in Islamic Politics

                            Fri, April 10, 2009 - 3:32 PM
                            Salil:
                            > Is it ok for me to point out that Erik either doesnt read or doesnt comprehend the sources he uses to attempt to defend his positions?

                            Well, yes. I'd say that it fits into the realm of condescension rather than abuse.

                            But you'd make my job here easier, and lessen the chance that others will respond with attacks if you try to tone down that condescension.
                            • Re: Women in Islamic Politics

                              Sat, April 11, 2009 - 11:01 PM
                              April 12th, 2009
                              Judge upholds man’s marriage to girl, 8
                              Posted: 01:38 AM ET

                              By Mohammed Jamjoom
                              CNN

                              (CNN) — A Saudi mother is expected to appeal a judge’s ruling after he once again refused to let her daughter, 8, divorce a 47-year-old man, a relative said.

                              The ruling was Saturday in the Saudi city of Onaiza. Late last year, the judge rejected a petition to annul the marriage.

                              The case, which has drawn criticism from local and international rights groups, came to light in December when the judge, Sheikh Habib Al-Habib, declined to annul the marriage on a legal technicality. Al-Habib’s dismissal of the mother’s petition sparked outrage and made headlines around the world.

                              The judge said the mother — who is separated from the girl’s father — was not the legal guardian and therefore could not represent her daughter, the mother’s lawyer, Abdullah al-Jutaili, said at the time.

                              The girl’s husband pledged not to consummate the marriage until the girl reaches puberty, according to al-Jutaili, who added that the girl’s father arranged the marriage to settle his debts with the man, “a close friend.”

                              Last month, an appeals court in the Saudi capital of Riyadh declined to certify the original ruling, in essence rejecting al-Habib’s verdict, and sent the case back to al-Habib for reconsideration.

                              Under the Saudi legal process, the appeals court ruling meant that the marriage was still in effect, but that a challenge to the marriage was still ongoing.

                              The relative, who said the girl’s mother will continue to pursue a divorce, told CNN the judge “stuck by his earlier verdict and insisted that the girl could petition the court for a divorce once she reached puberty.”

                              The appeals court in Riyadh will take up the case again and a hearing is scheduled for next month, according to the relative.

                              Child marriages have made news in Saudi Arabia in the past year.

                              In a statement issued shortly after the original verdict, the Society of Defending Women’s Rights in Saudi Arabia said the judge’s decision went against children’s “basic rights.”

                              Marrying children makes them “lose their sense of security and safety,” the group said. “Also, it destroys their feeling of being loved and nurtured. It causes them a lifetime of psychological problems and severe depression.”

                              Zuhair al-Harithi, a spokesman for the Saudi Human Rights Commission, a government-run group, told CNN that his organization was fighting child marriages.

                              “Child marriages violate international agreements that have been signed by Saudi Arabia and should not be allowed,” al-Harithi said.

                              Child marriage is not unusual, said Christoph Wilcke, a Saudi Arabian researcher for the international group Human Rights Watch, after the initial verdict.

                              “We’ve been hearing about these types of cases once every four or five months because the Saudi public is now able to express this kind of anger, especially so when girls are traded off to older men,” Wilcke told CNN.


                              So much for the Saudis abiding by the UDHR.
                              • Re: Women in Islamic Politics

                                Sat, April 11, 2009 - 11:16 PM
                                And, from what I understand, they are also bound by the same international human rights provisions.

                                Top cleric rejects changes to Afghan Shi'ite law
                                Sat Apr 11, 2009 5:13am EDT

                                KABUL, April 11 (Reuters) - A top Shi'ite cleric said on Saturday the Afghan government had no right to change a law for Shi'ite Afghans that was widely condemned by Afghanistan's Western backers for curbing women's rights.

                                The Shi'ite Afghan Personal Status Law was an idea of Ayatollah Mohammad Asef Mohseni, who led the council of leading Muslim clerics which helped draft the legislation.

                                The law, meant to formalise minority Shi'ite family law which differs from the majority Sunni population, contains articles that some lawmakers have said would legalise marital rape and U.S. President Barack Obama called "abhorrent".

                                Earier this week, Afghan President Hamid Karzai said he met the justice minister and the country's most senior religious leaders to discuss the law, which has already been passed by parliament and signed by Karzai but has not yet come into effect.

                                But Mohseni said any changes to the law were unacceptable.

                                "The Justice Ministry has no right to change any article," Mohseni, who is widely regarded as the religious leader of Afghanistan's Shi'ite minority, told a news conference.

                                "Any changes it brings will be against the constitution," he said, adding the West was putting too much pressure on Karzai to change the law. "If he changes the law, he works against our democracy, if he keeps it he is accused of being authoritarian."

                                Women's rights have improved significantly in Afghanistan since the 2001 overthrow of the strict Sunni Islamist Taliban government. It prohibited women from working, attending school or leaving their homes without a male relative.

                                But Afghanistan remains a deeply conservative Muslim society, particularly in remote rural areas, something the Kabul government has to balance alongside demands from its Western backers for a pluralistic, democratic political system.

                                Some Shi'ite women officials have said they approve of the law in principle because it enshrines important differences between the Shi'ite and Sunni Muslim sects in Afghanistan, but that in its present form it was unacceptable.

                                Some lawmakers have also said Karzai signed the law hastily because he is facing a crucial election on Aug. 20 and wants to curry favour with Shi'ite voters, who can swing an election. (Writing by Golnar Motevalli; Editing by Sugita Katyal)


                                Of course, so are all the predominately Muslim states, who are members of the UN. Anybody know if Malaysia has repealed their recently passed statute that banned women from traveling without the permission of their husband or father?

                            • .
                              .
                              offline 39

                              Re: Women in Islamic Politics

                              Sun, April 12, 2009 - 7:53 AM
                              Good, just wanting to clarify. When Erik actually starts addressing the arguments and stops his non stop stream of ad homs I'll have no reason to condescend!

                              • Unsu...
                                 

                                Re: Women in Islamic Politics

                                Sun, April 12, 2009 - 8:37 AM
                                <<Adam : But you'd make my job here easier, and lessen the chance that others will respond with attacks if you try to tone down that condescension.>>

                                <<Good, just wanting to clarify. When Erik actually starts addressing the arguments and stops his non stop stream of ad homs I'll have no reason to condescend! >>


                                I'm not certain if stopping your condescension only when you no longer have a reason for it is what he was angling at.
              • .
                .
                offline 39

                Re: Women in Islamic Politics

                Sun, April 12, 2009 - 7:59 AM
                So now that I've trashed Erik's claims regarding the Sudan genocide, which although horrible, does not add up to the around 2-3 million Saddam killed (1 million Iran Iraq War, 1 million from coercive application of sanctions, 300,000-1,000,000 political killings) I want to address this ongoing myth of the "Arab Sudanese"

                "Not to mention how ever many Arab Sudanese were killed while executing these attempts at genocide. "

                Arab does not mean Muslim, and despite the Western media constantly referring to the janjaweed militia as Arabs, they are not ethnically Arab. They're Africans.

                www.ens-newswire.com/ens/aug...eed3.jpg
                • Re: Women in Islamic Politics

                  Sun, April 12, 2009 - 10:13 AM
                  I, of course, was talking about killing one's own citizens. Not about those killed in a war with another state, or debatable accusations of "coercive application of sanctions." If you wish to make a case for either being counted, go ahead. I merely reject your contentions. Sudanese who speak Arabic generally call themselves Arabs, although others sometimes call them Arabised. They certainly have dark skin, and have many African roots, but so did that famous Arab leader of Egypt Anwar Sadat. If you ever get the opportunity to travel around the Middle East, you will find many dark skinned people who are culturally and linguistically Arab, and would take offense at being called anything else. They are the majority of the Sudanese population, and are the ruling class, which is most probably why Sudan has been a member of Arab League since the 50s. They have other names for those ethnic Africans from Darfur and the South. Not very nice. In any case, the semantics are irrelevant. You may believe otherwise, but I would again reject your contention.

                  According to this source, which I find pretty comprehensive:

                  users.erols.com/mwhite28/w....htm#sadhus

                  # Iraq, Saddam Hussein (1979-2003): 300 000

                  * Human Rights Watch: "twenty-five years of Ba`th Party rule ... murdered or 'disappeared' some quarter of a million Iraqis" [www.hrw.org/wr2k4/3.htm]
                  * 8/9 Dec. 2003 AP: Total murders
                  o New survey estimates 61,000 residents of Baghdad executed by Saddam.
                  o US Government estimates a total of 300,000 murders
                  + 180,000 Kurds k. in Anfal
                  + 60,000 Shiites in 1991
                  + 50,000 misc. others executed
                  o "Human rights officials" est.: 500,000
                  o Iraqi politicians: over a million
                  * [These don't include the million or so dead in the Iran-Iraq War.]

                  The estimate of 300,000, seems pretty reasonable to me. You may disagree (with both myself and the U.S. Government) but, once again, I'd reject your contention. Saddam was in nearly complete control of Iraq for about 25 years, and the Baathists for another 5 or so, for a total of around 10,000 a year, give or take. Even if the low ball estimate of 300,000 for Darfur was true (which it is not) as that was from some time ago, and the killing has continued, it must certainly be higher. Add to that, the Christian and animist (generally not Arab speaking) killed along with government (Arab) forces in the South during the periods of (1955-1972) and (1983-well it is still going on although they claim it is not), and you get a total of around 2,700,000. Averaging out at over six times the Iraqi yearly total. Darfur alone is a larger number, accomplished in one sixth the time. Not as bad as, say, the DRC or Rwanda, but pretty damn bad, and certainly worse than Iraq.

                  So, now that I have done my best to both clarify my meaning, and reject your contentions, I'll address your posts no further, and try to get back to the subject of this thread. Don't bother replying, as your response will be ignored. I'm sure you will anyhow, for reasons discussed previously but, oh well. It is nothing personal, it is merely that I find your condescending attempts to belittle others, for whatever personal reasons, tedious, and i don't wish to waste my time sorting through them for the small kernels I might find of interest.


                  Tough place for female political activists:

                  Female Afghan official gunned down
                  Achakzai known for fighting for women's rights
                  By NOOR KHAN The Associated Press
                  Sun. Apr 12 - 11:44 AM

                  KANDAHAR, Afghanistan — A female provincial official known for fighting for women's rights was gunned down in southern Afghanistan on Sunday, following a day of fighting in the region that left 22 militants dead, officials said.

                  A Taliban spokesman, Qari Yousef Ahmedi, claimed responsibility for the attack.

                  Gunmen killed Sitara Achakzai outside her home in Kandahar city and then drove off, said Matiullah Khan Qateh, police chief of Kandahar province. He said the four men drove up on two motorcycles and shot Achakzai as she was getting out of her car.

                  Achakzai, a dual German-Afghan citizen, spent the years of Taliban rule in Germany and returned to her native country to fight for women's rights, said Shahida Bibi, a member of the Kandahar women's association who worked with Achakzai.

                  A member of Kandahar's provincial council, Achakzai was vocal in encouraging women to take jobs and encouraging them to fight for equal rights, Bibi said.

                  The day before in neighbouring Zabul province, Afghan soldiers and police killed 22 militants in a nighttime gunbattle, the Interior Ministry said in a statement. The ministry said an Afghan army convoy had came under attack and police came to its aid.

                  The U.S. military separately reported that Afghan and coalition forces killed four militants Saturday in the same area _ the Shinkay district of Zabul province. It was not immediately clear if the reports referred to the same incident.

                  The U.S. said the joint forces were attacked Saturday by gunfire and rocket-propelled grenades while patrolling in Shinkay. They fired back and called in close-air support, a U.S. statement said.

                  Provincial police Chief Abdul Rahman Furjung said four bodies had been brought to the district police station but locals reported finding many more dead in the area. He also said 22 militants died.

                  Neither Furjung nor the U.S. military reported any civilian casualties, and the U.S. said no Afghan army or coalition troops were wounded.

                  Also Saturday, a suicide bomber was killed in southern Helmand province when he tried to enter a police station, the Interior Ministry said. Police shot the would-be bomber and his explosives detonated before he could enter the compound. The attacker was the only person killed, the ministry said.

                  Meanwhile, NATO forces reported that they killed 18 insurgents Friday in a strike against insurgents in Kunar province.
                  • This is the maximum depth. Additional responses will not be threaded.
                    .
                    .
                    offline 39

                    Re: Women in Islamic Politics

                    Sun, April 12, 2009 - 10:49 AM
                    There's nothing debateable about over a million people dying because of the way Saddam

                    a) insisted on a regime that would be sanctioned
                    b) the way he distributed the resources he did get through the sanctions

                    and to argue otherwise is sheer nonsense.

                    And to arbitrarily say that a leader is not responsible for the deaths resulting from aggression against a neighbor and throwing men in front of human waves is just that - arbitrary.

                    Saddam aggressed against Iran for territorial gain, as he did in Kuwait, and threw his citizens into the meatgrinder.

                    You are simply engaging in sample restriction - if you want to say Saddam only murdered 300,000 of his own citizens, that's fine. but you can't say he only killed that many.

                    But then that discredits your entire argument regarding the Sudan, because the janjaweed are not part of the Sudanese government, and therefore, by your own reasoning, the Sudanese government is not responsible (I think this is a ridiculous claim, but so many of your claims are ridiculous). Beyond that, your western-centric understanding of nation-states simply don't apply in failed states like the Sudan, which are 'nations' in name only. Additionally, you are essentially pretending that civil wars are truly intra-state, when in fact they are clashes between two segments of a state, each claiming independence and non-affiliation with the other. The SLA and JEM do not consider themselves citizens of the Sudanese government, so your entire argument falls apart.

                    Now, 4th generation Chinese Americans in NYC are linguistically English, and largely culturally Anglo Saxon too, but to say that they are English is as retarded as saying that Sudanese are Arabs. Arab speaking is not Arabic, and the language they speak is not truly Arabic, but an Arab influenced Sudanese language that is drastically different from actual Arabic, tribal and Nubian in grammar, vocabulary, and syntax. But of course, you know more about this than I do, what with all your years studying Arabic (if I ever get the opportunity, again, to travel there, you mean, I'll see many Black people speaking Arabic who are Muslim - not the same as Arabs).

                    You know, English is a Germanic language, but its drastically different from German. Sudanese is an Afro-Semitic language, but its dramatically different from Arabic.

                    oh, right, responding to you confirms your amateurish diagnosis, wow, I didn't realize that. Ok, you posting any of this confirms my assertion that you don't really have the faintest clue regarding these issues! Sweet, now that that's settled, lets see what other balderdash you can present.


                • Re: Women in Islamic Politics

                  Sun, April 12, 2009 - 1:01 PM
                  Salil:
                  > Arab does not mean Muslim, and despite the Western media constantly referring to the janjaweed militia as Arabs, they are not ethnically Arab. They're Africans.

                  We've had this discussion before, and I'm not sure you're right. Here's what wikipedia has to say:

                  "An Arab (Arabic: عربي‎, ʿarabi) is a person who identifies as such on linguistic or cultural grounds.[9][10] The plural form, Arabs (العرب al-ʿarab), refers to the ethnocultural group at large."

                  Not that wikipedia is the definite reference, but an Arab seems to be anyone in the Arab world (maybe defined by the Arab League) no matter what the color of their skin is.

                  Therefore the Sudanese are Arabs. And I'm pretty sure that's how they refer to themselves in North-Western Sudan.

                  Erik:
                  > Judge upholds man’s marriage to girl, 8

                  I don't understand how any fundamentalist Islamic government would ever outlaw marriages to children over the age of 5. Mohammed married a girl at 6, to criminalize that would be to say that Mohammed was wrong.
                  • This is the maximum depth. Additional responses will not be threaded.

                    Re: Women in Islamic Politics

                    Sun, April 12, 2009 - 1:53 PM
                    So? Mohammed was a pedophile. At least by today's standards. Also a mass murderer. A rapist. A slaver. A war criminal. A fraud. And a simple thief. Among other things.

                    All the great holy books justify these sort of things. Stoning of disobedient children. Selling daughters into slavery. Death for apostasy. Burning of witches. Trial by torture. Burning of widows. Untouchables. And the list goes on and on. Of course, you know this, as you have read at least some of these disgusting texts.

                    There are plenty of fundamentalists of all stripes, be they Christian, Jew, Hindu, whatever, who would follow their texts to the letter if we let them. Among the world's major religions, only Islam practices such irrational idiocy to this degree. Some things are relative.

                    All religions are bad. Just some are relatively worse than others.

                    As far as Arabs go? I let people define themselves as they wish. Geneticists have pretty much debunked the whole concept of race having anything to do with anything other than in the minds of certain people. The woman I came to Europe with, with whom I lived for ten years, was named Karima. She was from North Africa. Tunisia specifically. Her first language was Arabic. Everyone in her family calls themselves Arabs. They claim to be able to trace their family lineage back to the Prophet, through the Cherif line. Some would be quite offended if you told them they weren't Arabs, but Africans.

                    • Unsu...
                       

                      Re: Women in Islamic Politics

                      Sun, April 12, 2009 - 2:50 PM
                      <<All religions are bad. Just some are relatively worse than others.>>

                      Curious as to your list of what's 'bad' about Christianity.
                    • .
                      .
                      offline 39

                      Re: Women in Islamic Politics

                      Sun, April 12, 2009 - 3:22 PM
                      There are plenty of Arabs in North Africa
                      • Re: Women in Islamic Politics

                        Sun, April 12, 2009 - 3:24 PM
                        tbi
                        • Re: Women in Islamic Politics

                          Sun, April 12, 2009 - 3:32 PM
                          Religions are lies made up by people. Basing your world view upon them is irrational. The reason Christianity is relatively more benign than Islam is that we in the West have subsumed God's law, as written in the Old and New Testaments with more rational human laws. There are those that fundamentally believe in the actual written word. Just relatively fewer of them. Jainism and Bahai seem, to me, to be even more benign. Doesn't make them any more rational.
                  • This is the maximum depth. Additional responses will not be threaded.
                    .
                    .
                    offline 39

                    Re: Women in Islamic Politics

                    Sun, April 12, 2009 - 4:00 PM
                    Sorry Adam, just because I speak Arabic and am intimately familiar with Arab culture, and have an Arabic name, doesnt make me an Arab.

                    It doesn't make Arabic Speaking Persians Arab, or Arab speaking Afghanis Arab, etc. What you are repeating is Orientalist propagated ethno-centric sloppyness. And while the Sudan is a member of the Arab League, that analysis ignores that they are also a member of the AU

                    Arabs are a semetic race - and despite the "progressive" claim that there is no race, there are most certainly ethnocultural groups bound by genetic markers. There is no doubt that there is a significant amount of blending - I'm not disputing that, but the tribal culture of the tribes that gave rise to the janjaweed is far, far, far closer to the nubian tribe they are attacking, than it is to Arabian peninsula culture.

                    Calling these "Muslims" Arabs (many Muslims would be shocked at the non-Islamic influences on Sudanese Islam, and consider them heretical) is tantamount to calling Indian Subcontinent Muslims "Arabs" - its just not accurate.

                    There are distinct Arab tribes in the Sudan - I never said they werent - but these are not populating the Janjaweed militia - the Rashaida are one example of this.

                    www.angelfire.com/ma2/yoss/rshida.jpg

                    www.spiegel.de/internatio...182,00.html

                    www.zeleza.com/blogging/a...ck-africans

                    www.lrb.co.uk/v29/n05/mamd01_.html

                    If you want to believe that Arabic speaking Persians are really Arabs, go ahead. I can't stop you.
                    • Re: Women in Islamic Politics

                      Mon, April 13, 2009 - 12:23 AM
                      Salil:
                      > If you want to believe that Arabic speaking Persians are really Arabs, go ahead. I can't stop you.

                      Like most groups on earth, it's as much a matter of self-identification as anything else.

                      Do you know how the janjaweed militia members think of themselves?

                      Do they think of themselves as African or as Arab?
                      • Re: Women in Islamic Politics

                        Mon, April 13, 2009 - 2:00 AM
                        John:

                        Sorry, no offense intended. It isn't a premise, but a conclusion to which I've come over the years. Much of what is written in all the holy books (not just the Abrahamic) is demonstrably false. As such, by definition, they can not have been written by an omnipotent infallible supernatural being, and must have been written by humans. Of course, some might say that God is unfathomable, but that would require circular logic.

                        If you look at just one case, say the first five books of the Old Testament, you can find thousands of errors of fact. Evidence to the contrary continues to build, be it linguistic, anthropological, archeological, historic, biological, or physical. The Orthodox Jews (read fundamentalists) claim it is the unchanging truth, written by God, and handed down to the chosen people. As the evidence against their claims grows, they must execute ever more gymnastic feats of logic to support their position. Eventually, they resort to circular logic, saying you can't understand God, which assumes the existence of a God not to understand. Both Christianity and Islam require faith in the truth of those first five books. I recently read "Bondage of the Mind" which examines Jewish fundamentalism, and quite convincingly demonstrates its illogic. I extrapolate and come to the same conclusions about other religions.

                        In any event, there are plenty of tribes where agnosticism, atheism, faith, etc. are vigorously debated. If you explore them, put your thick skin on.

                        For me a big problem is, the treatment of women, based upon religious mumbo jumbo created during the more ignorant past, to answer what, at the time, were unanswerable questions, and projecting them into the 21st century is illogical and, in my view, immoral. This particular thread is about the impact of those falsehoods upon women in Islam, and what they can or can't do about it politically.

                        In my view, Muslim women need more control over their own lives, and must achieve this politically, rather than through their misogynistic religion. Historically (not just in Islam), men have controlled women for biological reasons. In anthropology, they call it an adaptive behavior. Animals (a sub set of which I include humans) instinctively want to ensure that it is their genes in the children for whom they must invest so much. Women know (well until recent medical advances like invitro) that this is so. Men needed to make sure their daughters were chaste, as they were more valuable property, and their mates were faithful, so as to ensure their line. In the modern world, these cultural adaptations, which might have been considered necessary (if unfair), are now both unfair and maladaptive. Women being able to control their procreation (birth control) is a big step. Just look at the impact it has had in the West. If a man is concerned that a child born to his mate isn't genetically his, he can now simply have an inexpensive genetic test done, if he wishes. As such, controlling women like so much herd stock for breeding, is no longer a defensible cultural adaptation. As if it ever really was.
                        • .
                          .
                          offline 39

                          Re: Women in Islamic Politics

                          Mon, April 13, 2009 - 10:10 AM
                          Erik, do you think religion caused the subjugation of women, or that religion simply institutionalized something that had long existed. I mean, even primate societies do it.

                          I'm not justifying it, by any means - I tend to agree with you in principle if not in specifics and reasoning on these matters.
                      • .
                        .
                        offline 39

                        Re: Women in Islamic Politics

                        Mon, April 13, 2009 - 10:14 AM
                        I doubt you would find a universal answer to that question - but no matter how much a Chinese Englishman identifies with modern Anglo Saxon culture, or has a scottish accent, or whatever, they're not Anglo.

                        The culture of the janjaweed tribes is distinctly African - we don't generally call Spaniards Arabs, right? There are Arab tribes in Sudan. The ruling class tends to be more Arab than most, but the janjaweed are not members of either of these groups.
                        • Re: Women in Islamic Politics

                          Mon, April 13, 2009 - 1:04 PM
                          tbi
                          • .
                            .
                            offline 39

                            Re: Women in Islamic Politics

                            Mon, April 13, 2009 - 5:43 PM
                            yet another well crafted rebuttal.

                            Like John asked you before, why do you even bother?
                            • Re: Women in Islamic Politics

                              Tue, April 14, 2009 - 12:52 AM
                              tbi
                              • Re: Women in Islamic Politics

                                Tue, April 14, 2009 - 12:53 AM
                                And another fine example of women participating in the political process:

                                edition.cnn.com/2009/WORLD.../index.html
                                • Re: Women in Islamic Politics

                                  Tue, April 14, 2009 - 11:44 AM

                                  "As retaliation for the military presence, the Taliban carried out a series of deadly attacks, beheadings and destruction of girls' schools."

                                  Great. :-(
                                  • Re: Women in Islamic Politics

                                    Thu, April 16, 2009 - 2:28 AM
                                    Afghans protest new marriage law, pelted with stones

                                    Updated Wed. Apr. 15 2009 11:17 AM ET

                                    CTV.ca News Staff

                                    A 300-strong group of Afghan women were pelted with small stones Wednesday as they protested against a controversial law that legalizes rape within marriage.

                                    A much larger group of about 1,000 Afghans -- both men and women -- swarmed the demonstration to throw stones and shout at the women.

                                    Police struggled to keep the two groups from clashing and even formed a human chain around the anti-marriage law demonstrators.

                                    The so-called Shia Family Law allows a husband to demand sex from his wife every four days unless she is ill or would be harmed by the act.

                                    Critics say the law, passed by Afghanistan's national assembly last month, essentially legalizes marital rape.

                                    It also confines women to the home unless they have a male escort.

                                    The law has sparked outrage among Western nations, including Canada, which forced President Karzai to issue a statement saying that he has ordered a review of the legislation.

                                    If made official, the law would only apply to the Shiites living in Afghanistan -- about 10 to 20 per cent of the country's 30 million people.

                                    Shiite supporters say foreigners are becoming too involved in the private affairs of Afghans.

                                    On Wednesday, the counter-protesters shouted "Death to the slaves of the Christians!" at the demonstrators.

                                    "You are a dog! You are not a Shiite woman!" one man shouted to a young woman protester.

                                    The woman, holding a banner that said "We don't want Taliban law," did not shout back.

                                    "This is my land and my people," she said.

                                    Fourteen-year-old Masuma Hasani said her whole family had joined the protest against the law.

                                    "I am concerned about my future with this law," she said. "We want our rights. We don't want women to just be used."

                                    Meanwhile, 24-year-old Mariam Sajadi said foreigners were the "enemy of Afghanistan."

                                    Sajadi, engaged to be married, said she plans to follow the law and ask her husband's permission to leave the house.

                                    She said the parts of the law dealing with sexual relations between husband and wife have been misinterpreted by Westerners.

                                    With files from The Associated Press

Recent topics in "Mideast Conflict"

Topic Author Replies Last Post
It's the Women Once Again Erik 0 Yesterday, 2:11 AM
Religion of Peace? Erik 1 December 14, 2009
NEW Middle East Politics tribe offlineJohn 13 December 14, 2009
Back UP, Obama-fans Bob 1 December 10, 2009